AbstractWhy should we typically act in accordance with our resolutions when faced with the temptation to do otherwise? A much-maligned view suggests that we should do so because resolutions themselves provide us with reasons for action. We defend a version of this view, on which resolutions provide second-order reasons. This account avoids the objections typically taken to be fatal for the view that resolutions are reasons, including the prominent bootstrapping objections.</jats:p
It is often claimed both that forgiveness is elective and that forgiveness is something that we do f...
When we see a consideration as a reason for action we see said consideration assupporting, or speaki...
According to fitting-attitude (FA) accounts of value, X is of final value if and only if there are r...
Why should we typically act in accordance with our resolutions when faced with the temptation to do ...
Why should we typically act in accordance with our resolutions when faced with the temptation to do ...
In Willing, Wanting, Waiting, Richard Holton lays out a detailed account of resolutions, arguing tha...
Reasons for action are central in understanding persons and in describing their moral obligations. W...
This paper explores the isomorphism between two relationships. The first is that between reasons and...
‘We don’t torture’, announced both Bush and Obama. But what Bush meant as a statement of fact, Obama...
I defend the relatively orthodox view that reasons for action are premises in good practical reasoni...
The paper argues that normative reasons are of two fundamental kinds, practical which are value rela...
A normative reason for a person to φ is a consideration which favours φing. A motivating reason is a...
It is commonly claimed, in normative ethics, that a reason for action is a consideration that counts...
Subjects appear to take only evidential considerations to provide reason or justification for believ...
In deciding whether to forgive, we often focus on the wrongdoer, looking for an apology or a change ...
It is often claimed both that forgiveness is elective and that forgiveness is something that we do f...
When we see a consideration as a reason for action we see said consideration assupporting, or speaki...
According to fitting-attitude (FA) accounts of value, X is of final value if and only if there are r...
Why should we typically act in accordance with our resolutions when faced with the temptation to do ...
Why should we typically act in accordance with our resolutions when faced with the temptation to do ...
In Willing, Wanting, Waiting, Richard Holton lays out a detailed account of resolutions, arguing tha...
Reasons for action are central in understanding persons and in describing their moral obligations. W...
This paper explores the isomorphism between two relationships. The first is that between reasons and...
‘We don’t torture’, announced both Bush and Obama. But what Bush meant as a statement of fact, Obama...
I defend the relatively orthodox view that reasons for action are premises in good practical reasoni...
The paper argues that normative reasons are of two fundamental kinds, practical which are value rela...
A normative reason for a person to φ is a consideration which favours φing. A motivating reason is a...
It is commonly claimed, in normative ethics, that a reason for action is a consideration that counts...
Subjects appear to take only evidential considerations to provide reason or justification for believ...
In deciding whether to forgive, we often focus on the wrongdoer, looking for an apology or a change ...
It is often claimed both that forgiveness is elective and that forgiveness is something that we do f...
When we see a consideration as a reason for action we see said consideration assupporting, or speaki...
According to fitting-attitude (FA) accounts of value, X is of final value if and only if there are r...